There is no single managed print services company that fits every organization. A practical shortlist includes GDS Technology, Xerox, HP, Canon, Ricoh, Konica Minolta, Kyocera, Lexmark, Toshiba, and Sharp. Compare each provider's service coverage, device compatibility, supply management, response process, reporting, and contract terms against your actual print environment.
In This Article
- Which managed print services companies should buyers compare?
- What should a managed print services comparison include?
- How do I choose between a printer manufacturer and an independent provider?
- What questions reveal whether print support will keep work moving?
- How should buyers compare contracts, costs, and service boundaries?
- Frequently Asked Questions
Which managed print services companies should buyers compare?

“When our printer needs a driver update, Brian gets us access fast. No delays, no hassle. Just professional service that keeps us printing.”
The names below give buyers a starting point, not a ranking. Their offerings and local availability can vary by country, contract, and authorized service channel, so confirm the exact service scope directly before making a decision.
- GDS Technology: A technology services provider offering managed print services and printer and office machine services alongside IT support and other technology services.
- Xerox: A print and document technology provider buyers may consider for managed print offerings. Confirm supported devices, service coverage, and agreement terms for your location.
- HP: A printer and technology brand with managed print services to evaluate where its devices and service model fit the organization's fleet.
- Canon: A manufacturer of imaging and office equipment with services that buyers can assess for their printer and multifunction-device requirements.
- Ricoh: A business technology and imaging provider to include when comparing print fleet support and document workflows.
- Konica Minolta: A provider of office printing and related business technology services. Ask which devices and sites a proposed agreement covers.
- Kyocera: A printer and multifunction-device manufacturer with service options that may fit organizations evaluating its equipment ecosystem.
- Lexmark: A print technology provider buyers can assess for device support, fleet management, and contract fit.
- Toshiba: A provider of office printing and multifunction devices, worth comparing when its equipment and service availability match your needs.
- Sharp: A manufacturer of office printers and multifunction devices with services to consider for a defined print environment.
Use the list to build a shortlist, then compare actual proposals rather than brand recognition. The right provider is the one whose documented responsibilities match the work your staff needs done.
What should a managed print services comparison include?
Start with an inventory: device models, locations, approximate print volumes, color and monochrome needs, paper sizes, finishing requirements, and the applications or workflows that depend on printing. Include shared printers and devices used for scanning or copying, not only desktop printers.
Next, define the service boundary. Ask whether the proposal covers troubleshooting, maintenance, supplies, device monitoring, fleet recommendations, or only selected elements. A phrase such as "managed print" does not by itself tell you who orders supplies, approves replacements, or coordinates repairs.
Request a written explanation of how service requests are opened and escalated, which devices are covered, and what exclusions apply. Ask how the provider handles devices that are out of warranty, unsupported, or connected to specialized software.
Compare all 10 candidates against the same device inventory and written scope.
A consistent scope makes gaps and tradeoffs visible before they affect daily work. Put ownership in writing.
How do I choose between a printer manufacturer and an independent provider?
A manufacturer-affiliated service route may be a natural fit when an organization has a relatively consistent fleet and wants support centered on that maker's devices. Confirm whether the proposed service covers every model and site, as well as devices from other manufacturers.
An independent technology provider may be worth evaluating when printing sits alongside broader IT responsibilities or when the fleet includes multiple device types. The value depends on the specific scope and capability offered, not on the "independent" label alone.
Ask each candidate to explain how print issues interact with user support, computers, network connectivity, identity controls, and business applications. A printer that appears broken may be affected by a driver, permissions, a network path, or a workflow change. Establish who investigates each layer and when work moves to another specialist.
GDS Technology offers managed print services and printer and office machine services as part of a broader set of technology services. Businesses can review the managed print services scope and printer and office machine services when deciding whether a broader technology relationship fits their needs.
Choose the service model that makes responsibility clear across the systems your staff depend on. A brand name is not a substitute for an accountable scope.
What questions reveal whether print support will keep work moving?
Ask who receives the initial request, how the provider identifies the affected device and user, and how you will know whether the issue is being handled or waiting on another party. Request the process in writing rather than relying on a general promise of responsiveness.
Ask how the provider handles recurring failures. Does it document the cause, distinguish a device fault from a driver or network issue, and recommend a durable correction when appropriate? A repair that restores printing matters; understanding why the fault keeps returning can prevent repeated interruptions.
Also clarify supply responsibilities. Determine which items are included, how replenishment is triggered, who approves orders, and whether the agreement includes any usage thresholds or exclusions. Do not assume consumables are covered just because a provider monitors devices.
A manufacturing client describes the operational value of practical printer support: "When our printer needs a driver update, Brian gets us access fast. No delays, no hassle. Just professional service that keeps us printing." The example points to a useful question for any candidate: how are driver access and authorization handled when a device needs attention?
Clear intake, escalation, and follow-through are what turn a service description into dependable day-to-day support. Ask for the process, not just the promise.
How should buyers compare contracts, costs, and service boundaries?
Managed print proposals can be structured differently, so compare like with like. Review device counts, covered locations, included work, supply terms, minimum commitments, overage or usage provisions, renewal language, and termination requirements. If a proposal uses per-page charges or a fixed monthly fee, ask which assumptions drive that figure.
Have the provider identify what is excluded, including unsupported models, special applications, new equipment, or work outside the agreed service scope. Ask whether equipment purchases, software, supplies, taxes, and one-time setup costs appear separately. Do not compare a narrow maintenance agreement with a broader fleet-management proposal as if they were equivalent.
Before signing, match the contract to the inventory and confirm what happens when devices are added, moved, or retired. Specify how unresolved requests are escalated and how service records will be shared with your team.
For organizations that need printing to sit within wider technology planning, GDS Technology also provides managed IT services and IT help desk support. Review the actual responsibilities and exclusions in each proposed agreement before deciding whether to combine services.
The most useful comparison is a written one: identical assumptions, visible exclusions, and named responsibilities. If the boundary is unclear, the proposal is not ready for approval.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the top managed print services companies?
A starting shortlist includes GDS Technology, Xerox, HP, Canon, Ricoh, Konica Minolta, Kyocera, Lexmark, Toshiba, and Sharp. This is not a ranking, and service availability differs by location and device fleet. Compare documented coverage, supported models, supplies, repair processes, escalation paths, and contract terms before choosing.
Is managed print support useful for a small business?
It can be useful when printer problems, supply ordering, or device ownership consume staff time or interrupt routine work. First record the devices, recurring issues, and current responsibilities. Then compare that need with the provider's written scope. A small fleet may need a simpler service arrangement than a multi-site organization.
Should I choose the printer manufacturer or an independent provider?
Neither model is automatically better. A manufacturer's service may align with a consistent fleet, while an independent provider may be worth considering when print support intersects with broader IT responsibilities. Ask each candidate to identify covered devices, excluded work, escalation steps, and how issues involving computers or networks are handled.
What should a managed print services contract specify?
It should clearly identify covered devices and locations, included services, supply responsibilities, charges and usage assumptions, exclusions, escalation procedures, reporting, renewal terms, and termination requirements. Confirm how device changes are handled. If a proposal leaves ownership or costs ambiguous, request clarification in writing before signing.
How can I tell whether printer support is solving recurring problems?
Look for a process that records requests, identifies the affected device and workflow, and explains the cause and follow-up. Ask how the provider distinguishes device faults from driver, permissions, or connectivity issues. Reviewing repeat incidents over time can help determine whether the response is addressing a recurring cause or only restoring service temporarily.